Skip to content
Corner Current Blog

The Iconic Puzzle Game Wouldn't Succeed at The Game Awards — An Additional Classification May Address This Issue

Whenever a major prize-giving event draws close, there’s always a demand for the addition fresh award types to recognize overlooked contributions and fill the passions of followers dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. The same goes for strategy board titles, this being someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward just as with other blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request stands as crucial above others. The demand is this: We need a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and it will always start arguments and end in fuzzy definitions. There’s a reason film award organizations avoid this approach. Yet it remains an unavoidable compromise in the world of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to be recognized, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events currently feature classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these six categories successfully include numerous genres, making space possible for most games within them.

Not so for puzzle games. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Think about these outstanding current releases, all very different: building puzzles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Which classification works among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

  • One classic puzzle game got overlooked completely during that awards season
  • Another creative title received no nominations that year
  • Well-received sorting experience was overlooked recently
  • Only a few puzzle games scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often small games, yet the craft in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games stand as the most-played games worldwide maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title rivals famous sandbox experiences competing to become highest-selling title ever; it also contends for top gaming experience. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. One could readily select five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.

And to reiterate, these are games without proper classification in important events. Logic title developers function at the challenging frontier game development, developing some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Just like film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait 35 years.

About the author

Tom Wyatt

A UK-based political analyst and writer with over a decade of experience covering Westminster and cultural shifts.

Corner Current Blog

Type to search articles.