🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid first step," commented the MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the local level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.